<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Through the Palms, #3</title>
	<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/</link>
	<description>Plein Air Painting Adventures with Ed Terpening</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: david lobenberg</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39840</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39840</guid>
					<description>Liking these palm studies! I agree that the back lighted one is the best. I also agree with Tom about separating the two palms with some of that warm, yellow back light and also a little more highlights peeking through the palms. Could Christian be right about #3 being better in that it was painted within your studio environment? I always seem to have to finish my outdoor work in my studio and with the help of reference photography. Wish I didn't have to do that so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liking these palm studies! I agree that the back lighted one is the best. I also agree with Tom about separating the two palms with some of that warm, yellow back light and also a little more highlights peeking through the palms. Could Christian be right about #3 being better in that it was painted within your studio environment? I always seem to have to finish my outdoor work in my studio and with the help of reference photography. Wish I didn&#8217;t have to do that so much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christian</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39631</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39631</guid>
					<description>Hi Ed,

I'm inline with the other contributors in choosing #3 for pretty much the same considerations. the contrast (use of more extreme values) and palette make the painting look more natural even though i never visited this place and your painting it in the studio.

#3 appeals more even for the tactile qualities of the palm tree bark and leafy parts - possibly aided by the use of more extreme values that help create depth and texture in the tree trunk and the palms themselves. But i feel you also invested more time rendering these in this painting than in the other two...could this be because you were painting in the more comfortable and stable studio environment?

For this same reason, i think that #3 possibly lends itself better to a bigger painting eventually and am just looking forward to see the outcome :)

From a composition perspective, i prefer #1 of the three as i find it leads the eye better into the central scene area onto the tree overlapping the right-hand side rock.I share the feeling that #2 seems to miss a focal point that can attract the eye and a path(s) across which to reach it.

Keep up the good work and the energy!

Chris (Malta)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m inline with the other contributors in choosing #3 for pretty much the same considerations. the contrast (use of more extreme values) and palette make the painting look more natural even though i never visited this place and your painting it in the studio.</p>
<p>#3 appeals more even for the tactile qualities of the palm tree bark and leafy parts - possibly aided by the use of more extreme values that help create depth and texture in the tree trunk and the palms themselves. But i feel you also invested more time rendering these in this painting than in the other two&#8230;could this be because you were painting in the more comfortable and stable studio environment?</p>
<p>For this same reason, i think that #3 possibly lends itself better to a bigger painting eventually and am just looking forward to see the outcome <img src='http://www.edterpening.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From a composition perspective, i prefer #1 of the three as i find it leads the eye better into the central scene area onto the tree overlapping the right-hand side rock.I share the feeling that #2 seems to miss a focal point that can attract the eye and a path(s) across which to reach it.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work and the energy!</p>
<p>Chris (Malta)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TomC</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39620</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39620</guid>
					<description>Ed,
They are all excellent Plein Air paintings. I agree with all the other bloggers that number 3 is the best of the series. Number 1 &amp;#38; 2 compositions may not translate well into large paintings. The palms on the left and right seem to wall off the paintings and become heavy to me, but I like them as small paintings.
Being from the suburbs of Chicago, I don't know palm trees very well. But in your number 3 painting, if I were going to make a large painting of it, I would add a &quot;slight amount&quot; of that yellow warm light in-between the large mass of the key palms,to make it clear their are two trees. I would also add some highlights peaking between some of the palms. I tried it in Photoshop and it lighten up the mass of the key two palms and added more of that great back light that you captured.
Ed, thanks again for the site and the opportunity to share our thoughts.
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,<br />
They are all excellent Plein Air paintings. I agree with all the other bloggers that number 3 is the best of the series. Number 1 &amp; 2 compositions may not translate well into large paintings. The palms on the left and right seem to wall off the paintings and become heavy to me, but I like them as small paintings.<br />
Being from the suburbs of Chicago, I don&#8217;t know palm trees very well. But in your number 3 painting, if I were going to make a large painting of it, I would add a &#8220;slight amount&#8221; of that yellow warm light in-between the large mass of the key palms,to make it clear their are two trees. I would also add some highlights peaking between some of the palms. I tried it in Photoshop and it lighten up the mass of the key two palms and added more of that great back light that you captured.<br />
Ed, thanks again for the site and the opportunity to share our thoughts.<br />
Tom
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: frank Gardner</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39593</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39593</guid>
					<description>I like 3 the best for sure. It has the best design. I like the back lit palm a lot and the way you have a simple flat hill contrasting the rich brushwork up front.
&quot;Keep values accrate as a foundation&quot;, Like that quote from the video demo.
1 is interesting too, but the palm top on the left seems squeezed in. I like the way you draw the viewer through the scene.
2, I am not sure where to look. Good color, but my least favorite of the three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like 3 the best for sure. It has the best design. I like the back lit palm a lot and the way you have a simple flat hill contrasting the rich brushwork up front.<br />
&#8220;Keep values accrate as a foundation&#8221;, Like that quote from the video demo.<br />
1 is interesting too, but the palm top on the left seems squeezed in. I like the way you draw the viewer through the scene.<br />
2, I am not sure where to look. Good color, but my least favorite of the three.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Terpening</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39588</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39588</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Mark, good feedback on these three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark, good feedback on these three.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark bridges</title>
		<link>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39557</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edterpening.com/blog/2008/04/15/through-the-palms-3/#comment-39557</guid>
					<description>Hey Ed. I think #3 is fantasticly the best. You have the contrast pop'en, where as in #1 it's too low, and #2 has perfect distant mountains but i also spend time looking at the light bushed in the center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed. I think #3 is fantasticly the best. You have the contrast pop&#8217;en, where as in #1 it&#8217;s too low, and #2 has perfect distant mountains but i also spend time looking at the light bushed in the center.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
